NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
More VRAM (20GB vs 12GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (2250MHz vs 2175MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 360.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+16%
26.73 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Mar 2023
Workstation Ada
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1725 MHz
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
192bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
40
6144
Shading Units
5120
192
TMUs
160
64
ROPs
64
192
Tensor Cores
160
48
RT Cores
40
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
