NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA T400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (2175MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
5760 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+2343%
26.73 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
May 2021
Workstation Ada
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
6
6144
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
