Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
6048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +11037%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
160bit
Memory Bus
192bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
96
192
TMUs
48
80
ROPs
12
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Board Design

130W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy