Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD FireStream 9370

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD FireStream 9370

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
4544 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +912%
26.73 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jun 2010
Workstation Ada
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
1600
192
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net