Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD FireStream 9270

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
5344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +2127%
26.73 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
6144
Shading Units
800
192
TMUs
40
80
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

130W
TDP
160W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy