NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
6064 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+33312%
26.73 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Apr 2010
Workstation Ada
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
80
192
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
130W
TDP
17W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
