NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
-
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
8
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
RV560
-
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
