Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +167%
23.04 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X2
8.602 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
4096
160
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT C9
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net