NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 40.06GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+2769%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
0.803 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2013
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
40.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
384
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.368 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.47 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
803.3 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.47 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
49W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GK208
-
GPU Variant
GK208-400-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
