NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+58976%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
2
5120
Shading Units
16
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
31W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
