Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +3652%
23.04 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
512
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
32
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net