NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (2400MHz vs 2250MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+17%
23.04 TFLOPS
Arc A770
19.66 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
2100 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
4096
160
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
160
Tensor Cores
512
40
RT Cores
32
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
