NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 5700M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 5700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 180W)
AMD Radeon RX 5700M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1720MHz vs 1455MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+12%
8.94 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5700M
7.926 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2020
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1465 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
2304
96
TMUs
144
48
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
247.7 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.85 TFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.926 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
495.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
180W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Navi 10
-
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XML
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
