NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 770M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 83% (1455MHz vs 797MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.19GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+484%
8.94 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 770M
1.53 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2013
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
706 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
797 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
960
96
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
24
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
12 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.94 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
63.76 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.530 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
63.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N14E-GS-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
