NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560X Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+307%
8.94 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560X Mobile
2.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2019
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
896
96
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.57 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.49 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.192 TFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.192 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
137.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Polaris 31
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 31 MXL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
3 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
