Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650M XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 120W)
AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 66% (2416MHz vs 1455MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
8.94 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6650M XT +10%
9.896 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
2068 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
2416 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
3072
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
32
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
154.6 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
309.2 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.79 TFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.896 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
618.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Navi 23
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
120W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy