NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 485M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+912%
8.94 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 485M
0.883 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
8
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.80 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
883.2 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-GTX-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
