Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 670M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
2736 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +1011%
8.94 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 670M
0.804 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
7
3072
Shading Units
336
96
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
24
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.372 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.49 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
803.7 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GF114
-
GPU Variant
N13E-GS1-LP-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net