Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 910M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 910M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce 910M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 910M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +1717%
8.94 TFLOPS
GeForce 910M
0.492 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1001 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.02GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.128 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.51 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
492.3 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.51 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GK208B
-
GPU Variant
N16V-GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net