NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro S4000X
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro S4000X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 88% (1455MHz vs 775MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+801%
8.94 TFLOPS
FirePro S4000X
0.992 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
725 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
775 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
640
96
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.40 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.00 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
992.0 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
62.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Venus
-
GPU Variant
Venus XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
