NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs Intel Arc Pro A30M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (2000MHz vs 1455MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+118%
8.94 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M
4.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
8
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
