Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile

We compared a Mobile platform GPU: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (2010MHz vs 1537MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +63%
10.29 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Mobile
6.296 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
832 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1537 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
48
80
Tensor Cores
64
20
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.78 GPixel/s
160.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.37 GTexel/s
10.29 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.296 TFLOPS
10.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.296 TFLOPS
160.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.37 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GA107S
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy