Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 660M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 112% (2010MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +1309%
10.29 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 660M
0.73 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
835 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
160.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.40 GTexel/s
10.29 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
729.6 GFLOPS
160.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N13E-GE-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy