NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A4000H
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (2130MHz vs 1560MHz)
Lower TDP (70W vs 140W)
NVIDIA RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
RTX A4000H
+59%
19.17 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
48
2816
Shading Units
6144
88
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
96
88
Tensor Cores
192
22
RT Cores
48
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
140W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GA104
-
GPU Variant
GA104-???-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
