NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 85W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+508%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360 896SP
1.971 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jun 2015
Quadro Ada
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
896
88
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
85W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Tobago
-
GPU Variant
Tobago XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3
