NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 250E
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250E to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250E 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1365%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250E
0.819 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1352%
8147
Radeon R7 250E
561
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Dec 2013
Quadro Ada
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
512
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
819.2 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
