NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 265
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 130% (2130MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+533%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Feb 2014
Quadro Ada
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
1024
88
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
