NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
2576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 219W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1680%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
30
2816
Shading Units
240
88
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
28
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
219W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
