NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD P30PH
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM P30PH to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 77% (2130MHz vs 1206MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 180W)
AMD P30PH 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (268.8GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+142%
12 TFLOPS
P30PH
4.94 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1206 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2100 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
268.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
2048
88
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.59 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
154.4 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.940 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.940 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
308.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
180W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Polaris 20
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
