NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 64MB VRAM GeForce2 Ultra to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 23 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 7.360GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Aug 2000
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 4x
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
230 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
7.360GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
-
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
NV15
-
GPU Variant
GeForce2 Ultra
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Celsius
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
180 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.025 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
88 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
7.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.5
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
-
