NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2416 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+2207%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
400
88
TMUs
20
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
43W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
