NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM GeForce 6800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Sep 2005
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 6 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
-
88
TMUs
12
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.400 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x Molex
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
NV42
-
GPU Variant
6800 XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
110 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.202 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
222 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
