NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 19 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 70W)
Score
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Aug 2004
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
-
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
NV43
-
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
110 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
