Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2776 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +37400%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
2816
Shading Units
40
88
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy