Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireGL V8650

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +2627%
12 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Aug 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
2816
Shading Units
320
88
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
R600
-
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy