NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireGL V5600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
2696 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+6150%
12 TFLOPS
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Aug 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
120
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
89W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
