Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 106W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +1896%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
0.601 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Mar 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
192
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.264 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.06 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
601.3 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.11 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GF116
-
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
106W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy