NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2130MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
+5%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Sep 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
70
2816
Shading Units
4480
88
TMUs
280
48
ROPs
128
88
Tensor Cores
280
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
8.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
