NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Intel Arc Pro A60
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (2130MHz vs 2050MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 130W)
Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+42%
12 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60
8.397 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+10%
8147
Arc Pro A60
7385
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
3601
Arc Pro A60
3623
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jun 2023
Quadro Ada
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
2048
88
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
64
88
Tensor Cores
256
22
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
131.2 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
262.4 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
16.79 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.397 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
DG2-256
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
11.5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
269 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
