Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +4360%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Nov 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
640MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
112
88
TMUs
28
48
ROPs
20
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
80 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.0
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy