ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 AGP and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon X1050 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 115W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2460MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (272.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2023
Radeon R300
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1830 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2460 MHz
203 MHz
Memory Clock
2125 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
272.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
-
Shading Units
3072
4
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
118.1 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
236.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.11 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
15.11 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
236.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
24W
TDP
115W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
RV360
GPU Name
AD107
-
GPU Variant
AD107-400-A1
Rage 9
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.06 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
76 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0 (9_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
-
Shader Model
6.7
