ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 AGP and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon X1050 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R300
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
875 MHz
-
Boost Clock
928 MHz
203 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2880
4
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
24W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV360
GPU Name
GK180
-
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
Rage 9
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.06 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
76 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0 (9_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.175
-
CUDA
3.5
-
Shader Model
5.1
