Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Vega 3 Embedded vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

AMD Radeon Vega 3 Embedded vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Vega 3 Embedded and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Vega 3 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1200MHz vs 1150MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 45W)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Vega 3 Embedded
0.461 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 +59%
0.736 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2019
Release Date
Jun 2013
Picasso
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
200 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
320
12
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
14.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.00 GTexel/s
921.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
460.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
736.0 GFLOPS
28.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
184.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Picasso
GPU Name
Haswell GT3e
-
-
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Generation 7.5
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
22 nm
4.94 billion
Transistors
Unknown
210 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.0
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net