Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 175W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
Vega
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
143 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
2.288GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
2
64
ROPs
2
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
286.0 MPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
286.0 MTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
VSA-101
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
180 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
15W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy