Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Boost Clock975MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 174.3GB/s)
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition +74%
3.482 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition
1.997 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Nov 2014
Crystal System
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
975 MHz
1362 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
174.3GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
16
2048
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
62.40 GTexel/s
3.482 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.997 TFLOPS
217.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy