Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M5725

AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M5725

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM FirePro M5725 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M5725 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition +706%
3.482 TFLOPS
FirePro M5725
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1362 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.3GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
4
2048
Shading Units
320
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
3.482 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
217.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
M96
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
M96 GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy