Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.3GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1532MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition +195%
3.482 TFLOPS
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
May 2017
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
1362 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.3GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
3
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.51 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.77 GTexel/s
3.482 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.38 GFLOPS
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1177 GFLOPS
217.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.77 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GP108
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy