AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+60%
5.733 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400
3.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
50W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
Navi 24
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
