AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2736 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+7066%
5.733 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
80
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
17W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
Cedar
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0
