AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs ATI FireGL V7600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+1392%
5.733 TFLOPS
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Aug 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
320
176
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
127W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
R600
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
R600 GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
